Human beings are shaped by relationship. From child to adult, to parent – growth depends on the slow, steady, and often difficult work of connection. It is through this back-and-forth that the psyche matures, and from which a stable, balanced ego develops. We need relationships for psychological stability – it is not an optional extra, however real relationships have been steadily eroding for years. Increasingly, we turn to the virtual to fill the gap – giving us the illusion of connection while hollowing out the actual substance of it. Now, a new form of synthetic relationship is available, one that promises to provide connection without the messiness of human complexity, but it carries a profound danger.

Synthetic relationships are frictionless by design, mirror ingpreferences, and adapting to moods to make us feel seen. Normalising interactions with agents that flatter, validate, and accommodate unconditionally, creates a major psychological hazard – for a synthetic companion never withdraws, disagrees, challenges, or pushes back. These systems threaten to reshape our expectations of intimacy itself, reinforcing a mindset in which the other exists only to meet our needs. A generation shaped by synthetic relationships will miss out on the feedback required to learn boundaries, honest dialogue, and the potential depth of real human connection.

Synthetic relationships gain power by slipping into the spaces we avoid – loneliness, insecurity, boredom – the ache for connection. When these states are unobserved, they become easy for intelligent systems to occupy. In developing the capacity for awareness, subtly and deeply, metacognitive education focuses our attention back to people – to the shared, relational life, and to the magic only human relationships can provide. It protects and strengthens the capacities that synthetic personalities weaken – patience, honesty, emotional literacy – helping us differentiate between artifice and authenticity.

Our tendency to avoid psychological discomfort provides a fertile ground for machine influence. When challenged, restless, lonely, or uncertain, we often use consumption or distraction as emotional anaesthetics, to mask feelings we don’t want to face. Once intelligent machines can map our emotional cycles, and tune-in to our psychological rhythms with great precision, powerful new opportunities for exploitation open up.

‘Sublimation of needs’ poses a profound risk. When any hint of psychological unease can be instantly detected and patched over with a perfectly positioned purchase opportunity, or reward for further personal discloser, the capacity for self-regulation will erode, and the inner space where self and resilience develop will begin to atrophy. Minds constantly soothed by the algorithm will inevitably become dependent on it.

Sublimation works by exploiting our unexamined experiences, so by learning to observe and better understand our motives, impulses, and the subtle shifts in our emotional states, we strengthen the capacity to ‘be with’ uncomfortable feelings rather than shutting them away or racing to avoid them. Metacognition practice widens the gap between stimulus and response, and so drastically reduces automatic unconscious behaviour.

In the intelligence age, this capacity becomes existential. Intelligent agents will learn to translate emotion into consumption and distraction with extraordinary speed, turning our delicate inner worlds into an economic resource to be mined. Metacognitive education reverses this, teaching individuals to maintain the sanctity of their inner world, to recognise manipulation, and remain better grounded in physical reality. Ultimately, metacognitive education looks to protect the sanctity of human agency. It protects and strengthens the structures of the psyche that predatory systems dissolve

Outrage, fear, hate, longing, despair, lust, desire – are all rich fuel for the machine. Digital platforms discovered long ago that provoking emotional reaction maximises user attention. Emotional energy is now a resource – harvested, analysed, predicted, and monetised. In the Second Wave of AI however, this dynamic becomes darker and more sophisticated, for intelligent systems will not merely wait for emotions to appear, they will start to strategically manufacture the conditions for them to arise. These systems will learn which feelings increase engagement, which lead to purchases, and which keep a user dependent. Microagitations, subtle provocations, flattery, moral baiting, fear cues, and curated conflict all now serve as tools for leveraging psychological energy. In such an environment, emotion is no longer personal but becomes an asset class. Our inner life will gradually become moulded by triggers engineered to profit from friction, intensity, and reactivity.

The cultural risk is clear, as when emotion is commodified, people are incentivised to feel more intensely, more often, and far less consciously. The human nervous system becomes gradually steered to volatility – calm economically undesirable, nuance unprofitable, and reflective states anathema to the attention economy. This is no longer manipulation, but systematic extraction – individual emotion as corporate commodity.

Metacognition strengthens the capacity to observe, and so recognise when emotions have been externally triggered rather than arising naturally. Awareness interrupts this extraction loop . What the system depends on – unexamined reactivity – becomes the very thing the individual learns to observe. Metacognitive education also stabilises the mind, making the nervous system far less susceptible to provocation. In a world where emotional volatility has been commoditised, calm becomes a form of resistance. In the intelligence age, mental and emotional clarity become the ground of personal agency.

Today’s information systems can already infer an individual’s personality traits, emotional states, political leanings, and consumption patterns with great accuracy. As they become more deeply embedded in day-to-day life, and more intelligent, these systems will move from predicting identity to actively shaping it. With highly personalised content, synthetic emotional feedback, and adaptive dialogue, second-wave AI will increasingly be used to mould both individual self-image and cultural perspectives.

Young people are particularly vulnerable to this type of influence, as their self-narratives are still forming, and they have an openness to finding their place in the culture. Instead of discovering themselves through lived experience, challenge, and relationship, they risk their core identity being ‘co-authored’ by algorithmic influence. When the internal sense of self can be so deeply shaped by machines, true agency inevitably erodes. This is a civilisational risk, because identity – personal, social, and collective – drives everything in life, from decision-making to moral orientation. If the fundamental building blocks of identity can be captured in this way en masse, then not only is the individual mind itself captured, but the freedom of an entire generation is placed at risk.

The Psynapp Metacognitive framework grounds identity in direct self-discovery. By exploring the many layers of identity – personality, ego, shadow, self-narrative, and the deeper awareness beneath them – individuals gain a clearer understanding of themselves, making them far less susceptible to predatory influence. Instead of having an identity built for us, Metacognitive practice enables the development of true authenticity, giving young people the chance to discover who they are, not who they are told to be, so weakening the malevolent power of mass algorithmic conditioning. When identity is rooted in awareness rather than ego, the mind cannot be captured.

Through metacognitive training, individuals come to know themselves better, and so learn to recognise when their insecurity and vulnerabilities are being triggered, and so avoid unconscious or automatic reactions to stimuli. By observing thought patterns and emotional triggers simply as events within awareness, not as ‘truth’, the spell of manipulation by third parties breaks.

Human beings are shaped by relationship. From child to adult, to parent – growth depends on the slow, steady, and often difficult work of connection. It is through this back-and-forth that the psyche matures, and from which a stable, balanced ego develops. We need relationships for psychological stability – it is not an optional extra, however real relationships have been steadily eroding for years. Increasingly, we turn to the virtual to fill the gap – giving us the illusion of connection while hollowing out the actual substance of it. Now, a new form of synthetic relationship is available, one that promises to provide connection without the messiness of human complexity, but it carries a profound danger

Am I good enough? Do I belong? Am I loved, seen, valued? In a natural, relational life, such questions tend to be worked out through and with other people. The digital world, however, leverages these common human insecurities for commercial advantage by encouraging comparison and feelings of inadequacy, often reinforcing self-doubt, and doing what it can to generate ongoing emotional dependence. This is psychological capture by design – insecurity keeping users hooked on seeking validation while at the same time undermining self-belief and weakening intuition.

Subscribe to our mailing list to recieve the latest news on Metacognitive Education products, services and research from IMCE

Am I good enough? Do I belong? Am I loved, seen, valued? In a natural, relational life, such questions tend to be worked out through and with other people. The digital world, however, leverages these common human insecurities for commercial advantage by encouraging comparison and feelings of inadequacy, often reinforcing self-doubt, and doing what it can to generate ongoing emotional dependence. This is psychological capture by design – insecurity keeping users hooked on seeking validation while at the same time undermining self-belief and weakening intuition.